John O'Hara (Brooklyn politician)

John Kennedy O'Hara (born c. 1961[1]) is an American lawyer (disbarred 1997; reinstated 2009[2]), active in Brooklyn, New York politics as a political reformer opposed to Brooklyn's Democratic machine.[3] He is also the first person convicted of illegal voting in New York State since Susan B. Anthony was convicted for voting (before women had the right to vote) in 1872.[4][5]

The son of working-class Irish Americans and the first in his family to go to college,[6] O'Hara's interest in politics was clear even in childhood: at the age of seven he wrote to his congressman complaining that he didn't have the right to vote but was still required to pay sales tax on toys. At the age of 11 he worked on George McGovern's campaign in the 1972 presidential election. At 16, his investigative reporting for his school newspaper resulted in the school principal being fired for lacking the appropriate license for his job.[7]

As a teenager and young man, he was involved with Brooklyn's Reform Democrats against the Meade Esposito machine,[7] but became disillusioned by 1984 as he saw them (in his view) turning into an alternative political machine under Jim Brennan.[8] In 1990, after working his way through City University of New York School of Law driving a taxi,[9] he passed the New York bar exam,[9] March 27, 1991[2] and became a Wall Street attorney.[10]

In the 1990s, he ran for office six times in primary elections against Brennan Democrats, never winning but coming within a few hundred votes in a 1992 election for New York State Assembly.[9] Getting on the ballot so many times despite machine opposition was a feat in New York, a state which "for years produced fifty percent of all election litigation in the United States."[11]

In 1996, O'Hara was charged under an almost completely disused law requiring that one's voting registration must be based on one's "fixed permanent and principal home": People v. O'Hara became the first-ever conviction under this law.[4] For twelve months in 1992-1993, he lived in two apartments in Brooklyn.[4][5] Both were in the same voting district.[5][12] He had never voted more than once in any election.[5] The charge was that he had claimed the wrong one for voting purposes.[4][5]

Refusing any plea deal, after a mistrial and a reversal on appeal, O'Hara was convicted of a felony in July 1999, sentenced to five years probation, an $20,000 fine, and 1,500 hours of community service picking up garbage.[13] The case also resulted in his disbarment on November 10, 1997.[2][5]

He continued to appeal his case, and continued campaigning on behalf of other anti-machine candidates, especially for judgeships.[14] O'Hara-backed Peter Sweeney and Eileen Nadelson won judgeships in 2001 and several other insurgent candidates have won Brooklyn judgeships since then.[15] An attempt was made to prosecute Nadelson for election fraud for false petitions; these turned out to be obviously false petitions by "a person or persons unknown to [her] campaign."[12] Civil rights lawyer Sandra Roper, backed by O'Hara in a failed 2001 candidacy against District Attorney Hynes[15][16] was prosecuted for what Christopher Ketcham says "most observers agree is an unfounded charge of grand larceny".[15] Roper's trial ended in a mistrial on November 8, 2004.[17] A Brooklyn judge then dismissed the charges February 28, 2005.[16]

On October 29, 2008, O'Hara's petition for re-admission to the bar was submitted by the Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department to the Committee on Character And Fitness.[2] The Full Committee on Character And Fitness for the Second, Tenth, Eleventh and Thirteenth districts, voted unanimously on June 29, 2009, to approve the subcommittee's recommendation that O'Hara's application for reinstatement be granted.[12] On October 6, 2009, O'Hara was reinstated as an attorney by the Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department.[2] However, his conviction still stands.[5]

In recommending O'Hara's reinstatement, the subcommittee of the Committee on Character And Fitness wrote, "Mr. O'Hara, accurately it appears, claims that the machine went gunning for him and pounced on his change of residency calling it election fraud. … Although the committee has grave doubts that Mr. O'Hara did anything that justified his criminal prosecution, even if Mr. O'Hara was guilty of the offense of which he was convicted, we believe Mr. O'Hara now has the requisite character and fitness to be reinstated as a member of the bar."[12] In December 2009, the New York Daily News urged a gubernatorial pardon to clear O'Hara's name, saying "It is beyond doubt that O'Hara was the victim of a criminal justice vendetta ginned up by enemies in the Brooklyn Democratic Party… At heart, the case was an example of selective and overzealous prosecution."[5]

Notes

  1. ^ Ketcham 2004, p. 47 says he was 11 years old when he worked on George McGovern's presidential campaign (which was in 1972).
  2. ^ a b c d e 1997-05257 In the Matter of John Kennedy O’Hara, a disbarred attorney, Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department, October 6, 2009
  3. ^ Ketcham 2004, passim.
  4. ^ a b c d Ketcham 2004, p. 53–54
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h Pardon him, governor: Brooklyn victim of political persecution should be exonerated, New York Daily News editorial, 2009-12-21. Accessed online 2010-01-25.
  6. ^ Ketcham 2004, p. 45
  7. ^ a b Ketcham 2004, p. 47
  8. ^ Ketcham 2004, p. 47–48, 49
  9. ^ a b c Ketcham 2004, p. 49
  10. ^ Ketcham 2004, p. 45
  11. ^ Ketcham 2004, p. 53
  12. ^ a b c d In the Matter of the Application of John Kennedy O'Hara for Reinstatement to the Bar of New York, State of New York Committee on Character And Fitness for the Second Judicial Department, 09-07-23. Accessed online 2010-01-25. The subcommittee report of 2009-05-21 is attached in the PDF.
  13. ^ Ketcham 2004, p. 45
  14. ^ Ketcham 2004, p. 54–56
  15. ^ a b c Ketcham 2004, p. 56
  16. ^ a b Diane Cardwell, Theft Charges Against a Rival to a Prosecutor Are Dismissed, The New York Times, 2005-03-01. Accessed online 2010-01-25.
  17. ^ John Marzulli, Mistrial in Fraud Case vs. Hynes Foe, New York Daily News, 2004-11-09. Accessed online 2010-01-25.

References

External links